We found no enacted state or federal law that bans stay-to-play as of October 14, 2026. Tournaments can still require it, and many do. What has changed is the pressure: bills are pending in two states and in Congress, parents have filed federal lawsuits, and the Texas attorney general's office has been reported to be investigating a youth hockey operator.
We are parents, not lawyers. This is a summary of public filings and news, not legal advice. Allegations below are claims by the people who made them. They are not court findings unless we say so.
Is stay-to-play against the law right now?
Not by any statute we could find. Many tournaments publish a housing rule, and many parents agree to those terms at registration. Whether a given rule is enforceable is a question for a lawyer, and we do not answer it here.
That does not mean the practice is settled. Two kinds of legal theory are being tested in court: antitrust "tying" (conditioning one product on buying another) and consumer protection (fees and claims about prices). Courts have not ruled for or against parents on either in a stay-to-play case that we found, apart from one dismissal covered below.
If your tournament has a rule, the practical advice is the same as always. Read it, follow it, and ask the organizer in writing if something looks wrong. See how to read a housing policy.
What bills are pending?
| Bill | What it would do | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Let Kids Play Act, S. 4522 and H.R. 8788 (federal) | Bars "conditioning eligibility to participate in any aspect of youth sports on the use of a designated travel agent, hotel or lodging accommodation, or transportation entity" | Introduced May 13, 2026 by Sens. Murphy and Booker and Rep. Deluzio. In committee. | GovInfo |
| New York S10428, "Fairness in Youth Sports" | Bars exclusivity and stay-to-play arrangements, requires disclosure of mandatory costs, $500 per violation per participant for undisclosed fees | Introduced May 15, 2026 by Sen. Rachel May. In Senate Consumer Protection Committee. | NY Senate |
| New Jersey A5506 | Would bar youth sports organizations from making participation depend on booking designated lodging, transportation or travel services. $10,000 first offense, up to $20,000 after. | Introduced September 17, 2026 by Assemblywoman Mitchelle Drulis. Referred to committee. | Hoodline |
| Washington HB 1860 (2023-24) | Would bar organizers from requiring teams to "stay at a specific lodging accommodation as a requirement for participation," enforced under the state Consumer Protection Act | First reading April 22, 2023, reintroduced January 8, 2024, committee hearing January 23, 2024. We found no record that it passed. | WA bill text, WA summary |
Some details matter. New York's bill exempts public school programs, the state public high school athletic association and organizations with annual costs under $750 per participant. The federal bill is broader than hotels. It also targets private equity ownership of youth sports, with divestiture provisions and a private right of action. We make no prediction on whether it advances.
A bill in committee is not a law. Most bills never leave committee. Our Stay-to-Play Watch updates the status of each one.
What lawsuits have parents filed?
There are three federal cases we can point to, all at early stages. We list the plaintiffs' claims and the companies' answers side by side.
Team Travel Source (W.D. Kentucky). Five parents filed a proposed nationwide class action against the company that does business as Team Travel Source, according to Buying Sandlot. Their lawyers at Almeida Law Group allege mandatory "junk fees," a "Lowest Rate Guarantee" that does not hold, and that parents were told teams could not compete unless they booked through the platform. The case is Russell et al. v. The Complete Plan, Inc., 3:26-cv-00360-CHB. The company told Buying Sandlot: "We deny participation in any alleged violation of the law." (Buying Sandlot, PR Newswire)
Black Bear Sports Group (D. Delaware). A proposed class action filed September 1, 2026 concerns the stay-to-play policy at Defender Hockey Tournaments, Tier 1 Hockey Federation and National Girls Hockey League events. Black Bear's attorney Doug Gansler told Front Office Sports there is "no coercion or coverup," that the allegations are "entirely without merit," and that the contracts parents sign disclose that the organization receives rebates from participating hotels. (Front Office Sports)
U.S. Junior Nationals (E.D. Pennsylvania). Patricia Martinez sued the youth basketball operator on February 18, 2025, alleging an illegal tying arrangement under antitrust law, according to Bloomberg Law. Ballertube reports the case was dismissed in August 2026 with leave to amend, meaning the plaintiff may refile. Ballertube says the judge found the antitrust elements insufficiently pleaded. That is a ruling on how the case was pleaded, not on whether families were harmed. (Bloomberg Law, Ballertube)
Ballertube also describes a precedent that is not a stay-to-play case by name. In a cheer antitrust class action against Varsity Brands, final approval of an $82.5 million settlement came in December 2024. Per Ballertube, the deal required that for five years at least 35% of Varsity cheer competitions would not require approved accommodations. Defendants did not admit wrongdoing.
Has any state attorney general acted?
One investigation has been reported. According to a November 2025 report, the Texas attorney general opened an antitrust probe of the Dallas Stars' youth hockey operations. The report says investigators were looking at, among other things, minimum three-night hotel stay requirements at Stars-run tournaments. It describes the probe as early and information-gathering. (AOL/Dallas reporting)
An early probe is not a finding. Oklahoma Watch reported in 2025 that Stars COO Dan Stuchal said the practice is very common, generates only a small amount of revenue and is needed to show cities the economic impact of events.
Does the FTC junk fee rule matter here?
It might, depending on the facts. The FTC's Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees (16 C.F.R. Part 464) took effect May 12, 2025. It covers short-term lodging, including hotels and vacation rentals, and requires businesses to state the total price up front, including mandatory fees. The FTC says the total includes "all charges or fees the business knows about and can calculate upfront." (FTC)
We have not found a public FTC action against a tournament housing company. Whether a booking fee on a tournament block falls under the rule is a question for lawyers. Parents suing Team Travel Source allege junk fees, and the company denies the allegations.
What you can do now is compare the all-in total, including every fee, before you book. Our trip cost calculator has a line for it.
What does this mean for my next tournament?
Three practical points, none of them legal advice.
- The rule on the page is the rule today. Pending bills do not change your event until they pass.
- Do not book outside the block to test the rule. Organizers can remove a team or charge a fee. If you think a policy is unfair, ask the director for an exemption the rules allow, and tell your club. See how to ask for an exemption.
- Keep records. Save the hotel page, your confirmation, any fees charged and every email with the organizer. Dates matter.
For the money side, read where the rebates go. For cancellation traps, see tournament hotel cancellation policies.
If you believe you were harmed, talk to a licensed attorney. We do not recommend any firm.
Check your tournament
Look up your event on our tournament finder to see what its hotel page says. If you would rather avoid the question, see the tournaments with no hotel requirement. We update this article when a bill moves or a case is decided, and you can follow along through alerts.
Frequently asked questions
Is stay-to-play illegal in the United States?
We found no enacted state or federal ban as of October 14, 2026. Bills have been introduced in Congress, New York and New Jersey, and lawsuits are pending. A tournament can still enforce its published rules, so read your event's policy and follow it.
Which states are trying to ban stay-to-play?
New York Senate Bill S10428 and New Jersey Assembly Bill A5506 are in committee. Washington HB 1860 was introduced in 2023 and, per the state's bill record, was reintroduced in 2024 and had a committee hearing on January 23, 2024. We did not find that it passed.
What is the Let Kids Play Act?
It is a federal bill introduced May 13, 2026 by Senators Murphy and Booker (S. 4522) and Rep. Deluzio (H.R. 8788). Its text bars conditioning eligibility on use of a designated travel agent, hotel or lodging accommodation. It is in committee and is not law.
Can I sue a tournament over a hotel requirement?
We cannot give legal advice. Parents have filed proposed class actions against Team Travel Source and Black Bear Sports Group, and a separate antitrust case against U.S. Junior Nationals was dismissed with leave to amend. Talk to a licensed attorney about your situation.
Does the FTC junk fee rule apply to tournament hotel bookings?
The FTC rule, effective May 12, 2025, covers short-term lodging and requires the total price, including mandatory fees, to be shown up front. Whether it applies to a given tournament booking is a legal question. Parents filing suit have cited junk fee claims.
Check your tournament
Look up the housing rule for the event your team is entering, with the rule quoted and the date we checked it. Or start with the tournaments that let you book any hotel.
Sources
- NY Senate Bill S10428 (Fairness in Youth Sports)nysenate.gov · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Hoodline: New Jersey bill would bar mandatory hotel bookings for youth sportshoodline.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- GovInfo: S. 4522, Let Kids Play Act (introduced text)govinfo.gov · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Washington HB 1860 (2023-24) bill textlawfilesext.leg.wa.gov · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Washington Legislature bill summary, HB 1860app.leg.wa.gov · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Front Office Sports: Parents sue Black Bear Sports over youth hockey hotel tacticsfrontofficesports.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Buying Sandlot: Youth sports parents sue tournament housing firmbuyingsandlot.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- PR Newswire: Almeida Law Group, Russell v. The Complete Planprnewswire.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Bloomberg Law: Youth basketball group accused of illegal hotel tying dealsnews.bloomberglaw.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- Ballertube: Stay-to-play is heading to federal courtballertube.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- AOL/Dallas reporting: Texas AG antitrust probe targets Dallas Stars, youth hockeyaol.com · checked Oct 14, 2026
- FTC: Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees FAQftc.gov · checked Oct 14, 2026



